Curated 17 Dial

The concept is for private booths in bars, but people with money can get it at home.

The UI is simple, there is a dial like an old rotary phone, with 17 positions. Not numbered, but could be, or use esoteric symbols. The idea is you change channel until you find something you like. The output is sound + video projected onto the wall. Yes, projected. People can get in the way.

Variety is important but the curated aspect is what you pay for.

For example a couple of channels will be sport, but they will be the most exciting live sport happening in the world right now. Could be lawn bowls or UFC. Could be in Scotland or Algeria.

Live feeds of public spaces. Again, curated. Where it is happening.

News service, but the most interesting that is live right now.

Throw in a classic movie, and some music channels – one could be a global what is hot in weird countries…

Steampunk access to the world at large. Aimed at open and adventurous minds.

Punishing Tour Schedules in Golf and Tennis

While personally I am disgusted to anyone who sells their souls to the Saudis, the oft-mentioned reason given by the pro golfers is that they don’t want to play a tournament every week of the year. Fair enough too, given that high performance athletes need breaks, and people who have earned 10s of millions might feel like they deserve breaks.

Yet, for golf especially, where results of the even the top players can be very uneven, the more tournaments there are means better data to work out who – on average – is the best. We know that the #1 player can go all year without actually winning…

The thing is, to get the maximum ranking points, you need to play 20 tournaments per year. One you factor in that they last 4 days (if you make the cut), and there are important practise rounds. Pro-Ams are on Wed, so the tournament is actually Mon-Sun, 7 days. Add one day for travelling and you can see why 20 tournaments is the most you would want to play…

Once you appear in 20+ tournaments, the average result of all of those is used for your rank. Results are used for your rank for the following 2 years, and they throw in recency bias as well. The major tournaments are worth more points, because they know that everyone will be there.

There is a solution, although it makes it harder for the average fan to understand.

  • Reduce the required tournaments to 10 (the negative being that fans get to watch the stars less often, potentially)
  • Base the weighting of tournament scores based on the average rank of who plays in it

Two things will happen:

Players will play as often as they want, so no more complaining. Quite likely the money, and the need to actually have tournament fitness, will mean they mostly keep the same schedule as they currently do.

There will be more variety in who plays which tournament. Lower ranked players can choose between lofty ambitions or achievable goals, as they already can do with the different tours (same goes for tennis).

The top players will trend towards the prize money more, tournaments that suit their majors preparation more, and tournaments that will get them the most points more.

Somehow or other, the top players will cluster more in the same tournaments than they do now. They will evolve things, not the PGA.