Compulsory Charitable Donations

The majority of charities do work that should be directly supported by the government. But governments, rightly or wrongly, make sure that donations from citizens are also required to support charities.

Any compulsory giving to charities benefits all of society, as well as the emotional well-being of those who give.

Profits – it has been suggested that a way for some businesses (for example, insurance companies) to operate would be to cap their profits at a certain amount – say 5% of capital, and that any excess be given to charity. That would let businesses be successful, but at the same time limit the motivation of profit.

Fines – governments fining businesses who do wrong could also be seen to have a more genuine motivation if those fines were donated to charity.

Taxes – meanwhile, one of the world’s richest people, Michael Dell, says the super-rich shouldn’t be taxed at higher rates because they tend to very philanthropic people, and money is better going to the causes they support, than to the government. Perhaps their charitable donations could be 100% tax deductible, and their income taxes rate rise at the same time.

For this to occur, the regulation and oversight of charities would need to increase significantly, as well as laws requiring complete separation from the charities you give to – perhaps even two or three degrees of separation. Any organisation that receives funding or support from a charity would need to publicly disclose this. 

Obvious Fakes

puma

I predict a backlash against major fashion brands…

The most famous brands have fake equivalents, buy them in Asia.

Apparently they are made in the same factory, after hours, with inferior materials.

When you come back with designer goods. from Asia, everyone knows it is a fake, and you will admit as much.

So why not make it a blanket statement?

The fakers deliberately misspell the brand name, or incorporate the word “fake” into the design.

The consumers deliberately use those goods, that are clearly fake, A statement.

We can own brands by belittling them.

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/hilariously-bad-chinese-knock-offs-of-famous-american-and-european-brands-2012-8

VirtuCoin: Killer Non-Government Economic Combo

You can take a bunch of trends and combine them into an alternate economy:

  • cryptocurrencies
  • equality
  • socialism
  • veganism
  • anti-war
  • corporate responsibility
  • corporate activism
  • libertarianism

In Essence:

  • Create a stablecoin (pegged to a currency or something else with a steady value).
  • Call it VirtuCoin, as in virtuous.
  • Create a payment processor (like PayPal).
  • Only allow it to be used by merchants that fit the criteria, such as not using slave labour. Or not evading taxes.

Many people want to consciously support good businesses, and not the “bad” ones. But it takes a lot of work, so much work it is more suited to an unemployed lefty vegan.

What if you used a currency that could only be used with good businesses, and only received from good businesses?

Then you create an alternate economy. Those who are excluded from it will be incentivised to improve their practises.

Investment funds exist that are like this, but they typically perform poorly, because they bad guys make more profits. By utilising spending power, change can occur.

The Trick: Start off with the least restrictions, but enough to exclude say 5-10% of major corporations. Then with time, tighten the screws.

End game examples:

Not valid for any merchant that sells Nestle products
Not valid for any merchant that sells cage eggs
Not valid with any fast food chains with restaurants in China
Not valid for electricity companies that have no renewable energy
Not valid for businesses in the USA that pay employees below $x per hour
Not valid for ISPs that lack net neutrailty

The Problems:

Very hard to please everyone
There will be a cost maintaining and monitoring business restrictions

Getting Started:

Prominent “good” businesses work together to create this, and they seed it by paying their staff a bonus with Virtucoin.
Those businesses must be undeniably good. Like Patagonia. They belong to various alliances – members of any of those could be a good starting point

Stability:

Tied to the US dollar on issue.
Ties to the US dollar on redemption.

Currencies go up and down, and major currencies go up and down quite slowly.

In the short term, your spending ability won’t vary too much from the initial value of the VirtuCoin.

In the long term, the value of the VirtuCoin can increase and decrease with equal probability (very few people can predict and profit from currency speculation).

Short term, spending the VirtuCoin is preferable.

Long term, if you don’t spend it, it might increase or decrease in value.

Bonus Feature:

For every 3 months your VirtuCoin is not spent, 1% of it is sent to the charity of your choice.

Buy Samsung Shares

samsung

Well, if only. You pretty much need to live in South Korea to buy them…

Google is being forced by the EU to decouple their core, profitable products, from Android. Which opens up opportunities for big players with big market share.

Samsung and the flavours.

Samsung sell so many phones that they can sell different versions of each model, a Google version and a Microsoft version.

One has Google’s email, calendar, search and so on built-in by default. The other has the Microsoft equivalent. No antitrust laws apply because the consumer is a given a choice at the very beginning. It could be argued that it is an antitrust duoply, but no other quality eco-systems exist for Samsung to offer.

Samsung can then seek kickbacks from Google or Microsoft to promote their services.

Or, Samsung could just end up with one Microsoft-dominated system. Microsoft will pay them generously to get the Bing search engine into mobile hands. They’ll get away with it for a few years, and then merely need to change it when EU regulators complain.

Delivered Meal Kits: Doomed to Fail

meal_kit

Meal kit companies won’t last. Well, I guess one might, after buying out some others and offering a huge range. And maybe one more if it targets the wealthy. But the others won’t.

No first mover advantage. It is the opposite. With time many people will want to try something new, and will move to a new service offering a bargain first few weeks. Food is like fashion, it has frequent change, especially at the low end.

Delivery doesn’t suit everyone, especially those in apartments.

Not profitable. I guarantee that all the current services are breaking even or losing money. When they put up their prices, people will leave. And any economy of scale from getting more customers will be lost by delivering to them – as they have all started where delivery is the cheapest.

Fad. Just like diets, a lot of current customers are experimenting with a new of doing things, but will soon resort to their old ways.

Supermarkets. Even here in Australia, they have started stocking meal kits. No subscription required!

The future – small stores, conveniently located, that sell meal kits and gourmet frozen meals. Yes, 7/11 etc could stock them, or they could be standalone specialist stores. People will pay a premium to not be in a subscription. Not being subscription means  not knowing how many of each to stock. So you stock less so that by a certain time you have run out, and some customers don’t get to buy. This works if the food is desirable enough. And anything that hasn’t sold by 8pm is half price.

Baja California Entrepreneur Economic Zone

011

Baja California is close to California, and easily defined geographically. It is popular with Americans.

Concept: attract internet companies to bring their money to Mexico.

  • no business or personal income tax for qualifying businesses
  • special temporary resident visas
  • minimum staff numbers and revenue requirements
  • 2% of corporate revenue and 15% of personal income must be invested in new Mexican businesses, with exclusions like real estate
  • Outside of the top 20 employees, 50% of salaries in value must be paid to Mexican citizens

Long-term goal, like one or two generations away, USA/Canada/Mexico will be like the EU. Better for everyone.

Memo Alert

Many companies, recently Google and Facebook, have been embarassed by internal memos that were leaked to the public.

I propose a memo system where staff members receiving a bulk memo can click on a button to say “I think this memo could damage our company if it got out”.

It is anonymous. If enough people vote against the memo, the authors or their superiors could look into it.